Blight Bedamned

8 Jun 11 by | No Comments | 19 view(s)
Categories: family, garden | Tags: ,

The little prince went away, to look again at the roses.

“You are not at all like my rose,” he said.  ”As yet you are nothing.  No one has tamed you, and you have tamed no one.  You are like my fox when I first knew him.  He was only a fox like a hundred thousand other foxes.  But I have made him my friend, and now he is unique in all the world.

And the roses were very much embarrassed.

“You are beautiful, but you are empty,” he went on.  ”One could not die for you.  To be sure, an ordinary passerby would think that my rose looked just like you–the rose that belongs to me.  But in herself alone she is more important than all the hundreds of you other roses: because it is she that I have watered; because it is she that I have put under the glass globe; because it is she that I have sheltered behind the scree; because it is for her that I have killed the caterpillars (except the two or three that we saved to be come butterflies); because it is she that I have listened to, when she grumbled, or boasted, or even sometimes when she said nothing.  Because she is my rose.”

——

And he went back to meet the fox.

“Goodbye,” he said.

“Goodbye,” said the fox. “And now here is my secret, a very simple secret: It is only with the heart that one can see rightly; what is essential is invisible to the eye.”

“What is essential is invisible to the eye,” the little prince repeated, so that he would be sure to remember.

“It is the time you have wasted for your rose that makes your rose so important.”

“It is the time I have wasted for my rose–” said the little prince, so that he would be sure to remember.

“Men have forgotten this truth,” said the fox.  ”But you must not forget it.  You become responsible, forever, for what you have tamed.  You are responsible for your rose…”

“I am responsible for my rose,” the little prince repeated, so that he would be sure to remember.

 

From “The Little Prince”, by Antoine de Saint-Exupéry

And so there it is, simply.  That’s why the food we grow, even it isn’t the best in a blind taste test, well, it’s still the best because it’s ours.

And so, while our tomatoes might be suffering a severe case of blight, and we’ve stripped most of the leaves off, they’re still our tomatoes.  So we’re gonna go waste some more time on them, in hopes that we get to eat them someday.

Lois Lowry is Brilliant

3 Apr 11 by | 1 Comment | 34 view(s)
Categories: family | Tags: ,

Sometimes I read books that are fun, but not important.  Yes, I’ll admit it.  I liked Hunger Games a lot.  I’ll even admit that I liked 3.5 of the 4 Twilight books.  (At some point, Renesme just becomes laughable.)

But then there are other books, books that are both fun and important.  I’ve read three Lois Lowry books in total (all aloud with the girls), and each of them is brilliant.  Right now, we’re half way through Messenger, the third in The Giver “trilogy”, and it is simply excellent.  Tonight, there was a fantastic quote… So, it must be shared.

Finally, she [Jean] looked up at Matty and said in a puzzled voice, “It was so important to him, and he made it important to me: poetry, and language, and how we use it to remind ourselves of how our lives should be lived…”

Jean was talking about her dad, Mentor, who had changed.  He had given up something of himself, in exchange for something of worldly importance.

Jenn and I love books, and we love the influence they have had and continue to have on our kids.  Whenever people ask us for parenting advice (or we decide to give it unsolicited), it is always, “Read to your kids a lot, from day one through at least day 3650.”  (You see, that’s as far as we’ve gone at this point.)

Reading to our kids every day has given them a lot.  They are so well spoken, they love to read, they have amazing attention spans.  Perhaps more important, though, it gives us a shared language.

A letter :: I don’t care what you become

26 Jul 09 by | 1 Comment | 161 view(s)
Categories: family | Tags: ,

Dear Aspen, Oakley, and Lindy.

I really don’t care what you want to be when you grow up. That’s right, I just don’t care that much. Oh, don’t get me wrong, I think your interests today are fascinating. I want to hear all about your plans and dreams every step of the way.

When you, Aspen, tell me you still want to be a farmer, I’m hooked. And when you tell me you want to be a doctor, and veterinarian, and countless other things I can’t remember, I’m enthralled.

________________

We saw a movie a couple of nights ago called “Food, Inc.

Keep reading…

Why I made you play soccer…

15 Mar 09 by | 1 Comment | 52 view(s)
Categories: Uncategorized | Tags:

(Tonight’s post brought to you by the fact that I’ve caught up with the live episodes of Lost and have nothing else to watch and the fact that soccer season is starting.)

When I visited Camp Chippewa a couple of summers ago, I came back very affected by it. The thought that still resonates from that trip is this.

It is a powerful thing to visit as an adult the place to which you attribute many of things about yourself of which you are most proud.

(For those of you who don’t know, I spent 3 summers as a camper and 5 or so as a counselor at a camp in northern Minnesota. The camp was run at the time by my 5th/6th grade math teacher, Mr. Endres, of whom I couldn’t be more fond. Still, to this day, Camp Chippewa is one of my favorite places in the world. It’s a small but traditional outdoor boys camp, complete with canoeing, sailing, swimming, tripping, soccer, archery, etc. I say this without hesitation, Camp Chippewa is the only reason I have ever wished that I had a boy. If you are reading this, and you have a boy who is 7 to 14 or will be 7 to 14 at some point in the future, you should unequivocally consider Camp Chippewa. Please ask me about it. Really.)

So, back to the primary thought of the post. I was given countless opportunities as a kid. I was exposed to the obvious boy stuff, like sports and boy scounts, and the less obvious stuff, “girly” stuff, like musical theater and Barry Manilow (thanks, Karen and Jenni). While I am admittedly proud of certain girly things about myself (that’ll be another post, for which you’ll have to wait patiently), many of the things of which I’m proud (self-sufficiency, toughness, leadership of a certain type) come from things like Chippewa and, in a more broadly accessible manner, sports. These are talents that I hope to instill in my daughters, talents that may well be more important for them as women then they were/are for me as a man.

While I recognize that my girls are 8 and 6 respectively, and I only can see a small part of the arc of their life story, I can already see such positive impacts from soccer (or generally team sports) for them. Our first practice for the spring was to be held March 3rd. Early spring weather in Nashville is a bit dodgy, and March 3rd was one of those days. Yes, it was dry enough, but the temperature was topping out around 40 degrees. Brrr. I picked the girls up at school, brought them over to the field, and we changed clothes in the car as we do each week for soccer. We changed in the car so we wouldn’t freeze when we got out. As we always do, we cruised over to the bathroom, etc, and filled up our water bottles. As we were returning to the car, we commented briefly on the temperature and both girls ran off toward the car. When we got there, it was apparent that neither was trying to jump back in… they were trying to get the balls out of the back so we could go play. How cool is that?! Seriously, it never even seemed to occur to the girls that it was too cold to play or that they should whine about it… they were both so focused on going to play a game. I hope that they will always remember, as they did on the 3rd, that doing something fun is worth the effort/pain required to do it. I was endlessly proud of them for that attitude (one that wasn’t shared by all the girls that day) and I told them as much.

A week later, we got the other end of Nashville spring… 70 degrees for practice. And you know what? The girls were ready to go again. We had our full team at Aspen’s practice for the first time, and we had literally just discussed the importance of toughness with the team. Early in the season, I regularly ask, “What do you do if you get knocked down?” The answer from the team? “Get back up.” Well, on the very next play in practice, Aspen took a hard fall, a bloody one, in which both knees immediately had some blood on them. Aspen wanted to cry; I could see it immediately. But do you know what she did? She popped up, ran to get her ball, and came right back to the drill and waited her turn. For me, in a group of 8 year old girls, this is the ultimate kind of leadership. It’s not about being the loudest kid, or the most obnoxious… this kind of leadership plays on the playground at school. This is a kind of leadership that I hope my girls always display. I trust that a simple bump of the knuckles with Aspen told her how I felt about her right then.

Enough bragging on my daughters. I really hope they keep playing sports for a long time. I hope I get to play with them. I spent about 30 minutes playing catch with Aspen today. I love to play catch. My girls have never been that into the repetitive nature of the game… it might be one of those things that’s just a little different between boys and girls. But today, Aspen was totally into it, and it was so much fun. I really hope it continues… But if it doesn’t, that’s OK. I hope they take away a few things from the experience. I’m pretty sure that they will.

"How many days?"

26 Jan 09 by | 5 Comments | 73 view(s)
Categories: Uncategorized | Tags:

This was a question of some importance over the past few weeks. Lindy goes to Brentwood United Methodist Day School, and I’m on the board there. It’s something I generally enjoy doing, and I really think highly of the program, so it’s the kind of thing I like to support. Theoretically, my input is valuable as I the only dad on the board.

Early this month, some of the folks on the board organized a seminar of sorts in which teachers from the day school and an area kindergarten spoke on the topic of “Kindergarten Readiness”. In atypical fashion, Jenn made the time to go to this one… it sounded interesting and Jenn is into educational theory. The speakers were all folks known to us… Jenny Majors is on the board with me, Jenny Patton has taught both Aspen and Oakley (and hopefully Lindy next year) at the Day School, and Reneta Gilliland is Oakley’s awesome kindergarten teacher right now. With some caveats, my understanding of the overall message was this,

“Kids are under prepared for kindergarten. You should err on the side of red-shirting your child (either gender) and you should probably err on the side of having your child in preschool more.”

Taking that a step further, the explanation is that the schools are being forced to do developmentally inappropriate material in kindergarten in an effort to achieve higher test scores when testing starts, in third grade. [Author bangs head against desk.] OK, so I’m not an educational theorist, but I do know I hate it when assessment techniques affect that which they are trying to assess. (Had I been blogging at the time, I would have gone nuts when I learned Tennessee schools start so early each year so they can have more instructional days before testing. I can’t reconcile this with the fact that they cancel school on cold mornings and regularly watch movies in class.)

It is also widely accepted (amongst the people to whom I listen) that overall achievement by the end of high school is no higher than it once was. In fact, most indications are that the US is struggling to keep up. As I’ve said before, I do none of my own research, I merely assess thing others tell me and see if they compute. Here’s the malfunction for me, though.

  • We’re doing more advanced work in kindergarten.
  • Our achievement by high school is less.

The number of years is constant. The kids are “constant”. What’s different? Are we just going slower? What are we improving?

So, back to the question of “how many days?” This comes up at this time of year because we (parents) all have to choose the number of days we’ll send our kids to preschool next year. For Aspen and Oakley, we’ve done 2 days each in the year before kindergarten. (Aspen had Encore as well, a great Davidson County program.) Now we’re trying to figure it out for Lindy.

After listening to the seminar and all of the women talking about it, this is what I thought. “Um, yeah, we’ve been pondering sending Lindy before she was technically eligible for kindergarten. She runs with her big sisters all the time, she loves going to school, she’s pretty capable physically, and she missed the cutoff by 8 days. From my perspective, I really like the idea of my daughters having each others’ support at school, too. The more they can be there together, the better.”

So many folks are leaning toward sending their kids more now than before, because they want to be sure their kids are prepared, conditioned. There was talk at one point of adding a day school class that went Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday so that kids could get used to going three days in a row. But Jenn asked me such a great question the other day.

“If sitting in school for long periods of time or for several days in a row is developmentally inappropriate at age five, when these kids are going to kindergarten, then why are we making preschool more like kindergarten?”

Really, if a boy can’t sit still for kindergarten at 5 years old, will being forced to prepare as a 4 year old fix it?

I still don’t know for sure what Lindy’s going to do in 2010-2011. We’ve been told she wouldn’t even be allowed to go to kindergarten early (even though people can hold their kids back without second thought). I think I’ll hold my horses on that battle for the time being, no need to have a fight I’m not sure I’d want to win. (If we wait for Lindy’s natural school year, it’s a near certainty that she’ll dominate on the football field as a freshman.) But for now, I’m certain that Lindy will be a 2 day a weeker at the Day School in 2009-2010. That is, unless she convinces us to let her go an extra day, ’cause she loves it.

TV

21 Jan 09 by | 1 Comment | 150 view(s)
Categories: uncategorized | Tags:

All of my best ideas come from books… books that, uh, well, books that other people read. That’s right. I’m literate, and fairly well spoken most of the time, and I struggle to read more than two books a year. My mom will be crushed, as she reads about two books a day. Oh well. Blogs and email are a sort of reading too.

I love finding some contrarian concepts and defending them on their merits… something like eating cookies every night as a form of diet (a story for another time). This one, though, comes from my wife.

I can remember coming home from work a while after Aspen was born and being completely obsessed with this new show I had discovered called The West Wing. OK, really, it had come out at least a year prior, but I’m behind on these things sometimes. I’m totally into Lost right now as well, but I’m mired in Season 2, not Season 5 (which starts tonight, I hear). I’d been so obsessed with catching up on the show via my VCR that I put it in for two hours every night when I got home. Ultimately, after a few weeks of this, Jenn called me on it. I was watching TV instead of playing with the girls, and she was tired of it.

Somewhere around this time, Jenn read a book called The Read Aloud Handbook, by Jim Trelease. This book as much as anything else is why our children basically don’t watch television. Seriously. I know other parents who “limit screen time” or “only let their kids watch a little bit”. I don’t begrudge anyone their choices, but our kids really don’t watch TV on their own at all. They will, if I am really into something, come down from a nap and finish a Titans’ game with me or something, but that might be 5 times a year.

The degree to which our kids don’t watch TV is something I would have never predicted years ago. I like TV. I watched it growing up, I watch it today. But, as Jim Trelease (or Jenn) would tell you, it does things to kids. It changes them.

The decision to not watch TV has had an incredibly positive impact on my daughters’ lives. Their ability to concentrate, speak, read, spell… their collective intelligence, they all amaze me. While I can’t scientifically prove that the absence of TV is the reason for their success, I believe these things have had huge impacts on them. Aspen and Oakley both, in 2nd grade and kindergarten respectively, read at levels far beyond their peers. You know why? ‘Cause they read all the time. Some of the time they read on their own, other times they listen while we read. All of it helps.

Will my kids ever watch TV? I suspect they will. It will be allowed, in doses, over time. They’ll pick up things. I actually have a firm believe that comprehension of popular culture is an important communication skill, it’s a fluency. They’ll have to learn who Simon Cowell is at some point, right? I mean, that is important. So the time will come, but it will be after a foundation of sorts is in place.

If you’re pondering the subject thinking, “But I need time to do such and such,” I can certainly understand. Were it me, alone, taking care of these girls, the TV would have undoubtedly been a part of our lives. I don’t have the patience to go without it all the time. I would have used it for a break. But my wife is committed and tireless. These words, coming from me, are a high compliment to her. Jenn’s commitment to a given cause is unwavering, and she literally has never turned the TV on for the girls. Amazing.

And you know what? There’s a payoff to all this. Aspen and Oakley, at this point, are so able to entertain themselves… it’s marvelous. (Well, it’s marvelous except when that entertainment includes pestering each other endlessly… with big vocabularies…) School? Homework? So far, they’ve been unequivocal successes. I give the girls credit, they both put forth proper efforts at school, but I have no doubt that their foundation has a lot to do with their success. Their ability to absorb is so different from kids who have learned to sit in front of a TV and have it wash over them. (I do this at night… I know what it’s like. There’s a state of mind where you don’t catch anything. My girls are unfamiliar with this state of mind. Sponges, they are.)

Aspen, certainly, is aware that she’s different. Her friends ask her if she’s allowed to watch TV… they know she isn’t, and she answers as much. Does it bother her? I’m not convinced that it does. When she talks about it, she does so matter-of-factly. Aspen and Oakley both are pretty free with telling me things they don’t like, things that should be different. (Aspen has made it clear that she should not be obligated to eat cashews. I, in turn, have made it clear that her mother will disown her if she disrespects that fine nut one more time.) Neither of them has ever said to me, “Daddy, can we watch ________ show?”

Why’d we do that to you? Well, Mommy read a book once, and so we started reading to you at night instead of turning on the TV. And, really, you seemed to like it, so we kept doing it. The reading became a habit, and the TV didn’t mind, so we kept going. Suddenly, it became apparent that you girls were smart and that you didn’t really miss the TV. The silence in the house lets us hear each other and learn from that.

I never would have suggested it, or even gone for it, eight years ago. It’s just too extreme. But would I go back and turn the TV on in retrospect? Not a chance.

Why I did that to you…

21 Jan 09 by | No Comments | 38 view(s)
Categories: Uncategorized | Tags:

One of my favorite blogs that I read regularly is Heather Armstrong’s. Why? Well, I don’t really know. I guess it’s mostly that she’s honest, writes well, and find some of the same things interesting that I do. Some of my favorite posts are the ones where she seems to be explaining something to her child, a child who is four years old and obviously doesn’t read the blog. I imagine that Leta, her daughter, will read her blog years from now and marvel at her mother’s insanity, candor, or vulgar mouth… or something.

So, some of the time when I’m working on this blog, I imagine that my daughters will find their way back to this blog years from now. Sometimes, that’s my filter… I don’t want to write something or post something that would completely embarrass them. Sometimes that future visit, though, gives me permission to write something preachy or self-serving. It is, after all, a note to their future selves.

So, later, when I post some pointless diatribe about using big words or not watching TV, you’ll see the tag “why i did that to you”. You’re welcome to skip right past it, or, better yet, tell me why I’m wrong.